Skip to main content

    Reviews & Governance

    Reviewed. Approved.
    On the record.

    Stakeholder review, named sign-off and automatic refresh cadence - built into the platform your courses are authored in. The audit trail regulated buyers ask for, without the email chains and PDF mark-ups.

    The problem

    Most course reviews happen outside the course.

    PDF exports go round on email. SMEs add comments in Word. Approvals are recorded as a forwarded message, a Slack thumbs-up, or a tick in a spreadsheet that nobody can find six months later.

    And when content goes stale - regulation moves, products change, policies update - nothing prompts a re-review. Courses keep running. Learners keep completing them. No-one notices until an auditor asks.

    CourseAgent Reviews closes that gap inside the platform the course is authored in.

    How it works

    A review workflow built for governance, not just feedback.

    Step 1

    Invite anyone - no seat, no licence, no account

    Send a review link to a stakeholder, SME, compliance officer or external auditor. They open it in a browser and start reviewing. No CourseAgent account, no seat to pay for, no waiting on IT.

    Step 2

    Comment in context, at the page or section level

    Reviewers leave threaded comments exactly where the issue is - inside the course as the learner will see it. No PDF mark-ups, no parallel Word documents, no lost-in-email chains.

    Step 3

    Named sign-off - on the record

    Approvers formally sign off the course - with their name, role, date and time recorded against the version they approved. Not a tick in a project tracker. A real audit record.

    Step 4

    Automatic refresh cadence

    Set a review interval per course - 6 months, 12 months, 24 months. CourseAgent prompts the right reviewer at the right time, so content can't quietly go stale on you.

    Why it matters for regulated buyers

    Defensible content - when someone asks.

    NHS trusts, financial services firms, professional bodies, regulated training providers - the question isn't whether your courses look good. It's whether you can prove who signed them off, when, and that they're still current.

    Audit-trail ready

    Every comment, change, approval and refresh check is recorded against a specific course version - exportable for regulators, internal audit or professional body inspection.

    Named accountability

    Sign-offs are attributable to a real person - not a shared inbox or a generic 'Reviewed by L&D' stamp. Defensible if questioned.

    Version-anchored

    Approval applies to the course version that was reviewed. If the content changes, the approval status reflects that - no false comfort from out-of-date sign-offs.

    Pairs with AI Compare & Update

    When Reviews flag a course as stale, AI helps you fix it.

    A refresh check that surfaces "this course needs review" is only useful if updating it is fast. Drop in the new source material - regulation update, revised policy document, new product spec - and AI Compare & Update changes only what's changed. The reviewer then re-approves the new version. The audit trail picks up where it left off.

    See AI Compare & Update

    On every plan

    Reviews are table stakes for trust - so they're on every plan.

    In-context comments, threaded reviewer discussion and named sign-off are included from Free upwards. Audit-trail export and automated refresh cadence are on Professional and Enterprise. No add-on to buy, no per-reviewer seats, ever.

    See pricing

    Start building better courses today.

    Free to start. No credit card. No technical skills required.
    Just describe what you want to teach.